Skip to content

What Coaches Look For at Tryouts

Nobody publishes a club rubric. One evaluation framework is written down, and it belongs to US Soccer.

The Soccer Untangled TeamEditorial · Jun 17, 2026 · 8 min read

Nobody publishes what a club coach evaluates at a youth tryout. No governing body sets a rubric, no league requires one, and clubs do not print their scoring sheets. Anyone who tells you the six things every coach is looking for is describing their own experience, which may be worth hearing, but it is not a standard.

One published evaluation framework does exist in American soccer, and it is worth reading even though it was not written for your kid's U10 tryout.

The one framework that is written down

US Soccer trains its own scouts against a framework it calls the Key Qualities. The federation named it publicly in August 2026, when it opened applications for licensed coaches to file player evaluations using "the U.S. Soccer P3 Talent ID Digital Platform and U.S. Soccer Key Qualities". There are six, and they are broader than the two things a parent tends to watch:

  • Game understanding and decision-making, meaning reading a situation and choosing quickly under pressure
  • Technical execution, meaning what a player can do with the ball while someone is closing them down
  • Physical execution, meaning movement and fitness
  • Growth mindset and winning mentality
  • Responsibility and initiative, which covers taking charge of your own development and being coachable
  • Learning ability, meaning the capacity to adapt to a higher level, judged over months rather than in one session

Two things about the scope matter more than the list. This is how US Soccer looks for future national team players, aged roughly 13 and up, watched over a long period. And the federation is explicit that the qualities any given club values are that club's own business, connected to its own identity. Nobody has adopted this as a youth tryout rubric.

So the list is a fair map of what soccer people mean by a good player. It is not what your local club promised to score, and you should not prepare a nine-year-old against it.

What the format lets a coach see

At U9 and U10 the game US Soccer specifies is 7v7, and at U11 and U12 it is 9v9, on smaller fields with a smaller ball. Those small-sided formats are the national standard, not a club's choice. Heading is not allowed in a 7v7 game or at U11. A U9 tryout is therefore a short game on a small field, and the things visible in that setting are a short list: whether a child can receive and move the ball with someone near them, whether they find space, whether they keep competing, and whether they do the thing the coach just asked.

Anything beyond that list is being inferred, by one adult, from a small sample. That is our read of what the format allows, not a claim about any particular coach.

What a place on the team is actually competing for

Rosters have hard ceilings written into rules, so "there was no room" can be the literal situation.

US Youth Soccer's national policy caps a team roster at 22 players and a game roster at 18. US Soccer's own best practice, which it does not mandate, is no more than 12 players on a 7v7 roster and 16 at 9v9. Higher up, ECNL caps a roster at 30 and MLS NEXT's Homegrown Division at 28 per age group.

Our read of what that means: a coach filling the last two places on a 12-player U10 roster is choosing between the players who are close, not ranking the room.

The part nobody can see in two sessions

US Soccer's own philosophy document states the beliefs its scouting is built on, and two of them belong to any parent reading a tryout result. "Players develop at different rates and their performance trajectory is non-linear." And talent identification is described as "a long-term examination and monitoring process, where current performance and future potential are influenced by environment, age and maturation."

That is the federation saying, in its own scouting manual, that a single viewing does not settle anything. Its own Talent ID Centers make the same point in practice: they are explicitly "not a formal tryout", they run a couple of hours, and no feedback is given to the player.

Age within the group is part of it too, and it has a name: the relative age effect. US Soccer notes that inside any age band a player can be "up to 364 days older than a teammate or opponent". Across 1,003 academy players at 23 English professional clubs, 45.0% were born in the first quarter of the registration year against 9.8% in the last. That is a UK academy sample and nobody has published the US equivalent, but the effect is well documented in the sport, and an autumn birthday in a group that runs August to July is a real disadvantage on a day when a coach is watching bodies.

What we would tell a parent, as advice

This part is judgment, not measurement.

Effort and attitude are the two things a child controls completely on the day, and they are the only two we would talk to them about beforehand. Skill on Saturday is whatever it has become by Saturday.

A tryout is a poor place to try something new. Playing the way they normally play, at the speed they normally play, gives the coach the sample the coach is actually deciding on.

And a cut at one club is a decision by one adult about one roster. If that is where you have landed, what to do next is its own piece.

If you want to see which clubs near you are realistic at your child's level before you pick which tryouts to attend, the club finder lists them by level, and the Pathway Report ranks them for your family with the reasoning written out.

Where these numbers come from

Common questions
Built for your kid

One piece down. Now the one about your kid.

Tell us their age, your town and the club they're at now, and the reading comes back as one page about that child.